Car pics too cool not to share

1714964694188.png
 

Damn! I support the purchase of either one of those! And while I really like the '41 Chev, I have always wanted a powder blue '63 Falcon Futura ragtop. I went and looked at one with the wife a few years ago, but ultimately decided it was just not the one. But that one you've posted...man, just go for it. ;)
 
Damn! I support the purchase of either one of those! And while I really like the '41 Chev, I have always wanted a powder blue '63 Falcon Futura ragtop. I went and looked at one with the wife a few years ago, but ultimately decided it was just not the one. But that one you've posted...man, just go for it. ;)

Although I'm not too keen on ragtops and I'd rather have the straight 6, nonetheless that Falcon is very cool. The '41 Chevy is just dreamy! Either one would beat any of the rolling iPhones we're saddled with today.
 
Love it! That's a '67 Dodge Dart GT, which happens to be my favorite A-body of all time. My second ever daily driver was one of those, only blue. I also owned a '67 GT convertible with a 383 and 4-speed in it. Sadly, that meme is spot-on when it comes to cars. :confused:
 
Damn! I support the purchase of either one of those! And while I really like the '41 Chev, I have always wanted a powder blue '63 Falcon Futura ragtop. I went and looked at one with the wife a few years ago, but ultimately decided it was just not the one. But that one you've posted...man, just go for it. ;)

Needs v8 front spindles and rear axle badly. Still a neat car!
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Squatch
I meant and should've said "the first engine in Formula 1/Grand Prix racing to be used as a stressed member of the car's chassis", not vehicles in general.

I suppose it's possible, stranger connections have occurred. While there's commonality in the existence of an engine in both, farm implements likely wouldn't be a port of call when looking to leverage competitive advantages and loopholes in a racing formula. That said, the idea was actually implemented in a production car, motorcycles as well as tractors long before it arrived in GP racing and the Lotus 49.

We'll probably never know but I can see it.

"We gotta go faster!"

"The car is too heavy."

"Well we need everything that's there."

"Do we really need the frame? My tractor doesn't have one."

"HMMM..."
 
but it likely started in aircraft

Colin Chapman, the founder of Lotus Engineering Ltd., went to school for structural engineering and was also exposed to aeronautical engineering while serving in the RAF. His "adding lightness" principle in his racing machines is likely a direct result of the latter.
 
Last edited:
Isn't that's the old "stove bolt" 6? If so, that engine was developed back in the '20s. I actually have one sitting in the woods, still attached to a '35 Chevy truck, or what's left of it.

Yup. The oiling system was a "dipper" type that essentially scooped up the oil from the pan and splashed it onto the necessary parts. Also, the main bearings are a poured babbitt style, instead of the easily replaceable shell type that we are accustomed to.